|
Quest for Refuge: Marvin S. Hill Signature Books; Salt Lake City, Utah Table of Contents: |
|||
|
The middle years of the Mormon sojourn in Illinois were ones of rapid growth and expansion as converts from the eastern states and England swarmed into the bustling city of Nauvoo.1 But with this growth came familiar economic problems.2 As early as March 1840, Joseph Smith had determined to abandon the impractical Law of Consecration,3 and increasingly afterward he and the other leaders hoped and planned for a more diversified and self sufficient economy.4 But providing the city with a stable business life was a formidable task, one that the Saints would not fully master before their exodus in 1846.5 From the first, land speculation and housing construction were, as in Kirtland, important enterprises because of the incoming converts.6 Many of the immigrants were impoverished upon arrival and had no cash to buy land or housing. The per capita wealth was depressed by their coming.7 Currency was chronically lacking, making trade by barter and payment in kind common.8 Hanna Ford commented in February 1844 that despite the scarcity of hard money, supplies in the city were generally plentiful.9 [p.128] Drawn into the gospel net was a host of skilled craftsmentextile workers, bootmakers, and cabinet and carriage makerswho clamored for industrialization.10 Church leaders responded by gaining a charter from the legislature to incorporate the "Nauvoo Agricultural and Mechanical Association," an institution for pooling Mormon resources to manufacture flour and produce lumber and other needed commodities.11 At a trade meeting in November 1844, Brigham Young and others spoke of the need for independence by manufacturing everything they would require.12 But the Saints were reluctant to invest in these new enterprises,13 so that through 1844 leaders were still searching for ways to promote them.14 Successful industries were those of the small craft and home varietya steam mill, grist mill, match factory and leather works, bakery, meat-packing plant, brick yards, and others.15 There is no evidence in the non-Mormon newspapers that these businesses competed successfully outside Nauvoo.16 Due to the dearth of coin and the inability to produce profitable exports, prices were generally high in Nauvoo. David Jenkins reported in September 1841 that staples cost more than in eastern cities, with coffee, sugar, muslin, and calicoes nearly double in price. Woodwork, including bedsteads, tables, chairs, and other household goods were also high.17 People were still complaining of high prices in 1843, and John Taylor admitted that prices were 25-50 percent higher than elsewhere.18 A few determined to relieve the money shortage by providing an imitation variety,19 but when this found its way into non-Mormon hands, the general distrust of the community was increased.20 By the summer of 1844 the Nauvoo economy was hurting. The editor of the Missouri Republican, who visited in July, said that there were but a few workshops or "manufactories" and that provisions were scarce.21 Sidney Rigdon indicated that there were more houses available than buyers and that building trades were therefore languishing.22 Many had to leave the city to find employment elsewhere.23 Despite this, leaders tried to maintain an optimistic front in their correspondence.24 But even boosters such as Orson Spencer had to admit that many were impoverished among them.25 As Rigdon observed, from an economic standpoint the Saints were in need of the good will of non-Mormons,26 but their activities associated with the kingdom tended repeatedly to alienate them from their neighbors. [p.129] A turning point in Mormon-non-Mormon relations in Illinois came in June 1843 after events at Dixon and the legal and political maneuverings that followed. When Joseph and Emma Smith visited Emma's sister near Dixon, Illinois, nearly two hundred miles east of Nauvoo, Joseph was taken into custody by two deputies, Reynolds from Missouri and Wilson from Carthage, under an extradition order issued by Governor Thomas Ford.27 The state of Missouri, with encouragement from renegade Mormon leader John C. Bennett, sought Smith for alleged involvement with Orrin Porter Rockwell in the attempted murder of Lilburn W. Boggs.28 After suffering abuse and insults from the deputies and being denied legal council for a time,29 Smith succeeded in contacting Cyrus Walker, a leading lawyer and candidate for congress on the Whig ticket. To secure Walker's legal assistance, Smith pledged that he would vote for him.30 According to his official history, Smith only committed his personal vote, but Walker understood otherwise since the Saints had followed the lead of their leader unanimously in other elections.31 Walker secured writs against the deputies for threatening Smith's life and placed them in the custody of the sheriff of Lee County.32 But in the meantime word had reached Nauvoo of the arrest of the Mormon leader, and 170 members of the Nauvoo Legion hurried to Monmouth, where they expected to prevent the deputies from taking him into Missouri.33 Smith had instructed Major General Wilson Law as early as August 1841 that "if I by any means should be taken [into custody by Missourians] these [orders] are to command you forthwith, without delay, regardless of life or death, to rescue me out of their hands."34 Smith was convinced that a return to Missouri would place his life in jeopardy. The deputies charged upon reaching Nauvoo that they had been taken there by force,35 although they were well treated and dined at the prophet's table.36 The incident caused alarm in the press,37 so that Governor Ford sent Mason Brayman as a special representative to Nauvoo to learn the truth about the charges. He concluded that the legioneers had exerted no overt force themselves but that the sheriff of Lee County had done so.38 In a court presided over by friends at Nauvoo Smith was released from custody.39 But the editor of the Quincy Herald wrote that if it was true that two hundred armed Mormons had effected the release of Smith "it is high time that the laws were most rigidly enforced, without respect to persons."40 [p.130] Jubilant that their prophet had been rescued, the whole town of Nauvoo turned out to welcome his return.41 Shaken by his encounter with the Missouri deputy, Smith promised a crowd that in the future he might appeal to a higher law: "If our enemies are determined to oppress us & deprive us of our rights & privileges as they have done & if the Authorities that be on the earth will not assist us in our rights nor give us that protection which the Laws & Constitution of the United States & of this State garrentees unto us: then we will claim them from higher power from heaven & from God Almighty." Smith said with respect to the deputies who had taken him into custody: "I SWEAR I will not deal so mildly with them again for the time has come when forbearance is no longer a virtue. And if you are again taken unlawfully you are at liberty to give loose to Blood and Thunder. But act with Almighty Power." Much in the spirit of Sidney Rigdon's 4th of July address in Missouri Smith warned his enemies still further:
Smith believed that the Nauvoo charters were part of his guaranteed rights:
The prophet concluded on a revolutionary note, saying "We will rise up Washington like & break of[f] the wait [weight] that bears us down & we will not be mob[b]ed."42 The threat of an appeal to arms by the prophet was matched in August by a similar declaration from Missouri. J. Hall wrote from Independence, "If Illinois by her own authority cannot capture the prophet, it will be but a small matter to raise volunteers enough here to raze the city of Nauvoo to the ground." Hall asserted that he had it from high authority in his state that "Missouri will hold the whole state [of Illinois] responsible for the treatment of our messenger and the delivery of the prophet."43 Smith feared additional attempts to take him into Missouri, and the city council passed a law on 29 June requiring newcomers to the city to give their names, former residence, and purpose. Any refusal or rendering of false information would be considered a violation of vagrancy laws. Nauvoo officers were empowered to enter hotels, houses, and places of amusement to inquire as to the intentions of all inhabitants.44 At the end of July some of the citizens of Adams and McDonough counties responded by resolving that henceforth no Mormons could reside among them.45 The spirit of suspicion, fear, and retaliation thus picked up momentum. Only the impending election curbed further hostile exchanges as the two national political parties sought the Mormon vote in Illinois. Even the editor of the Warsaw Message spoke of the unfortunate treatment of the prophet, saying that Missouri's harassment involved a "relentless persecution."46 Congressional candidates of both parties, Cyrus Walker of the Whigs and Joseph P. Hoge of the Democrats, visited the Mormon city and paid their compliments to the Saints.47 According to Thomas Ford, J. B. Backenstos was sent by the Saints to Springfield to learn what they might gain if they remained in the Democratic fold. A prominent party leader, in Ford's absence from the city, reportedly promised that special favors would ensue and that the state militia would not be called out to enforce the extradition order from Missouri.48 On July 29 Mason Brayman confirmed the promise, writing to Smith to say that although he could not speak for Governor Ford, he was certain that he represented his views. Brayman said that when he came to Nauvoo as a special investigator for the governor he sought to learn whether unlawful means had been used to arrest the prophet [p.132] and that Ford had not issued his writ for Smith's arrest out of hostility. He said that he was now convinced that Smith was not a fugitive from Missouri in the usual sense and that Governor Ford "will not in my opinion find least difficulty in refusing to issue another warrant, should an hundred be demanded." Brayman reassured the prophet, "Vote, preach, pray, and worship God as you please, so that you violate no law, you have nothing to fear from the Executive or his advisers."49 Oliver Olney noted the day after Walker and Hoge had addressed the Saints at length in Nauvoo that the Mormon leaders met in the temple and decided to form a "Political union in favor of the Democratic Party.…In the name of the Lord They in union move together to lay a foundation to put in office Such men as they pleas." Olney quoted the leaders to say that they would "first rule the county By going with one of the regular partys By thus doing they have much strength Besides their own." Olney said Mormon political ambitions went beyond the county. He quoted the leaders saying that "the time is not far distant when they will sway the [s]cepter Over the American soil."50 Thus before Smith had received Brayman's letter he had decided to go Democratic, despite his pledge to Walker. But no doubt the letter from Brayman reinforced this decision. On election day Smith told the Saints he would vote for Walker but "would not electioneer, would not controul or influence" the voting.51 He then informed them that Hyrum Smith had received a "testimony that it will be better for this people to vote for hoge & I never knew Hyrum [to] say he ever had a revelation & it failed."52 The result was a certainty. When election returns came in the Democrats carried Hancock County by over 1,300 votes. They also carried the state 7,796 to 7,222.53 Ford held to his promise and wrote to the governor of Missouri that there was no legal justification to call out the state militia to arrest Smith.54 But Ford wrote of this that "from this time forth the Whigs generally, and a part of the Democrats, determined upon driving the Mormons from the state."55 The editor of the Davenport Gazette, speaking for the Whig party, denounced Hyrum Smith's revelation as a "ruse" and a "blasphemy."56 Perhaps the prophet sensed that he had no genuine political allies in the state, even among Democrats, because he said on 13 August that "all our wrongs have arisen under the power and authority of democracy [the Democratic party] and I have sworn that these arms shall fall from my shoulders and this tongue cleave to the roof [p.133] of my mouth before I will vote for them, unless they make satisfaction."57 In selling the Mormon vote for favors and attempted security to two different parties, Smith caused both parties to distrust him. The consequence was a still greater feeling of alienation between Mormons and their neighbors. Anti-Mormon feelings were particularly intense in Hancock County at Warsaw and Carthage. Thomas Gregg, editor of the Warsaw Message, announced the election results on 6 September, writing, "Revelation now has the balance of power."58 At Carthage two victorious candidates whom the Mormons had supported for school commissioner and clerk of the county court were met by armed men and warned that they would never be sworn into office.59 Notices were posted that the Mormons must leave the state.60 In an effort to determine ways to force the Saints to leave, a call was made for an assembly at Carthage on August 19.61 People met briefly on the designated day, then decided to reconvene on 6 September when they would be better organized.62 Most of those who came were Whigs, but there were a few Democrats,63 the leaders being older citizens who had come to the county before the Mormons64 or people who resided in the eastern half of the county and felt disfranchised by Mormon power at Nauvoo.65 They all agreed that the Saints must no longer be allowed to hold the balance of political power in the county.66 From the subsequent meeting came a declaration of independence from the Mormon kingdom. The old citizens affirmed that the prophet had "set aside…all those moral and religious institutions which have been established by the Bible." They felt that Joseph Smith had shown "a most shameless disregard for all the forms and restraints of law," by having his "city council pass laws contrary to the laws of the State" and by causing "the writ of habeas corpus to be issued by the municipal court of the city…in a case not provided for in the charter…thereby procuring his own rescue from the custody of the law." Further, they said, "citizens from the adjoining counties have been denied the right to regain property stolen and taken to Nauvoo." Of the election, they felt that men "of the most vicious and abominable habits" have been "imposed upon us to fill our most important county offices." To "crown it all," the disgruntled citizens added, Smith "claims to merge all religion, all law, and both moral and political justice, in the knavish pretension that he receives fresh from heaven divine instructions in all matters pertaining to these things." After deprecating Smith's recent escape from the Missouri officials, the citizens resolved that henceforth they would "resist all [p.134] wrongs which may hereafter be attempted by the Mormons, to the utmost of our ability," and would "stand by and support each other in every emergency up to the death." At the conclusion was a call for armed assistance from Hancock and other counties and for the authorities in the state of Missouri to make another request for the prophet's extradition. This time they would cooperate in his apprehension. Addressing the heart of their frustration, they fumed that "it has been too common for several years past for politicians of both parties, not only in this county but also in the state to go to Nauvoo and truckle to the heads of the Mormon clan." In justifying their call to arms, they affirmed that when a government ceases to protect the people," the "citizens of course fall back upon their original inherent right to self-defense."67 The Saints requested that Governor Ford give them public arms and protection from invasion.68 But in their press they blustered, warning the Carthaginians that should they attack Nauvoo their lot might be that of Hannibal of old.69 John Greenhow, writing for the Nauvoo Neighbor, threatened "Little Tommy" Sharp with the fate of Humpty Dumpty should his ambition become too exalted.70 Such bellicosity did not help the cause of a non-Mormon like Thomas Gregg, who, although a fierce Whig partisan, deplored violence and insisted that the anti-Mormons must find a remedy "that will not interfere with the majesty and SUPREMACY OF THE LAW."71 There were those even at Carthage who lamented the growing belligerence and sought means other than violence to resolve the differences between the two hostile groups. Andrew Moore, an old citizen, said, "The Mormons are still making considerable stir here but not making many converts. They have ruled the elections in this county this last election and their is considerable stir here about it and some strong talk about driving them from the County." He said that "Them and the democrats have played a deep game here I mean some of the leaders of the democrats they have Screened Joe from justice to secure their vote…" But Moore, probably a Whig, said not everyone had joined the anti-Mormon mob spirit. There was still an alternative: "Our neighbors are some trading out to the mormons and leaving their is but few left in the settlement that was here when I Came to it and I think their will be few here if the mormons continue to come as they have been doing I we will all trade out to them and let them have the county."72 Those determined to use violence were more resolute than those ready to cooperate with the Mormons, and soon violence would [p.135] become the order of the day. Joseph Smith learned on 8 December that two citizens of Nauvoo had been taken hostage by armed men from Missouri and Hancock County and was told that rumors were circulating that these men intended taking others. To protect himself and others against this possibility Smith, as mayor, ordered a portion of the Nauvoo Legion to be ready to enforce city ordinances and keep the peace. He also asked the city council to grant additional legal protection,73 and the council responded with an ordinance stating that if any person came to Nauvoo with a legal demand based on old Missouri charges, he would be subject to arrest and, if convicted, to imprisonment for life. Pardon from the governor would only be possible with the consent of the mayor.74 On 18 December a Nauvoo city constable arrested non-Mormon John Elliott for kidnapping. A writ was also issued for the arrest of Levi Williams, who was similarly charged with kidnapping. At Elliott's hearing, testimony was given that there was a conspiracy against Smith and others and that "some of them would be shot."75 That same day two visitors to the city informed Smith that a group was collecting at Warsaw to protect Williams. Willard Richards in a sworn affidavit said that the group intended to attack Nauvoo.76 The city council reacted by passing another ordinance which stipulated that all warrants issued outside Nauvoo must be examined by the mayor, with fines to be levied against violators.77 This ordinance further embittered anti-Mormons, who vowed they would respond in kind. With the flight of the non-combatants and mounting militancy among those who remained, any middle ground between Saints and the old citizens was barely possible by this time. Thomas Gregg, who had earlier stood for a temperate, lawful response, now published in the Warsaw Message his fears of "an irresponsible and growing power at Nauvoo." This threat must be "met rightly," he proclaimed in an Extra, noting that a crisis was irreversibly approaching in the county and adjoining counties.78 In early 1844 anti-Mormons at Carthage found an opportunity to retaliate against the Nauvoo ordinance restricting outside legal process. When an officer of the county attempted to arrest Milton Cook of Hancock in January, he was prevented, and a cluster of armed men gathered around Cook and insisted that he not be taken to Nauvoo for a hearing.79 Intra-county comity had thus broken down, and the drums of war sounded. In Green Plains men had been drilling since mid-September 1843,80 and on 10 January 1844 militant Carthaginians announced their readiness to march on Nauvoo.81 [p.136] Meanwhile, frightened by these developments and disregarding the instructions of the governor,82 Smith called out the Nauvoo Legion to enforce city ordinances and chase down insurgents.83 The editor of the Missouri Republican accurately observed: "It is quite evident that law has lost all its obligations in the county in which the Mormons are principally located, and an embittered and hostile feeling is taking possession of the minds of both parties."84 Joseph Smith had been aware since July that there were dissenters within the fold who were opposed to his policies. The editors of his history quote him as saying, "I have secret enemies in the city intermingling with the Saints."85 After the Dixon affair he was so distraught by his near capture that he wrongly accused Sidney Rigdon of informing his enemies that he would be in that vicinity.86 In December he told his police force, "I am exposed to far greater danger from traitors among ourselves than from enemies without."87 Feeling threatened on all sides, Smith and his followers took refuge in apocalyptic hopes. Orson Pratt in April 1843 cited prophecies of Daniel, who had predicted a time when the kingdom of God would "sway a universal Sceptre over all the earth." Then more power would be conferred on the Saints and the "condemnation and judgment of Some corrupt powers of the earth" would take place.88 That fall Apostle Brigham Young told a congregation in New York that the "time is come for God to set up his kingdom" and that kings would come to "inquire after the wisdom of Zion."89 Apostle Parley P. Pratt admonished the same audience that consensus was mandatory among them so that "a great nation may be saved from all nations." He said he longed for the coming of a messianic leader who could save the nation and the world: "If I were an infidel, I would like to have the Lord raise up a Joseph or a Daniel, or a Mordecai, or an Esther, to obtain political, temporal and spiritual power, and cause a change for the good of the world."90 The Mormons had little confidence in democratic government at this time. Convinced that legal appeals were in vain, Smith resorted to unpromising, desperate schemes to protect Nauvoo. He called on the citizens of several states to come to the rescue of his people.91 In a letter to the "Green Mountain Boys" of Vermont written in late November, Smith called for retaliation: "Whenever a nation, kingdom, state, family, or individual has received an insult or an injury from a superior force, it has been the custom to call the aid of friends to assist in obtaining redress." Smith said it was his intention to "humble and chastise or abase" Missouri for "the disgrace she has wrought [p.137] upon constitutional liberty until she atones for her sins." He pleaded with the men of Vermont, "by all honorable means to help bring Missouri to the bar of justice." He said his only desire was to "frustrate the designs of evil men…show presidents, governors, and rulers prudence…teach judges justice." He said he would "execute justice and judgment upon the earth in righteousness, and prepare to meet the judge of the quick and the dead, for the hour of his coming is nigh."92 To secure legal sanction for his call to arms, Smith petitioned Congress to form Nauvoo into a federal district93 and grant him authority to command federal troops in defense of the city.94 He warned his closest friends that "if Congress will not hear our petition and grant us protection, they will be broken up as a government, and God shall damn them, and there shall be nothing left of themnot even a grease spot."95 Actually, Smith already despaired for the nation, telling U.S. senator John C. Calhoun that "if the Latter-day Saints are not restored to all their rights and paid for all their losses…God will come out of his hiding place, and vex this nation with a sore vexationyea, the consuming wrath of an offended God shall smoke through the nation."96 He told Henry Clay, also a U.S. senator, that the "glory of America is departed."97 The prophet announced his candidacy for president of the United States in January, saying that unless he was elected the nation would be doomed. George Laub recorded his prophecy that "if they elect him ruler of the nation he would save them & set them at liberty, but if they refuse they shall be swept off."98 Benjamin Andrews wrote to the Saints in the east: "The Lord, the mighty God, has ordained him a deliverer and Saviour to this generation, if they will hear his council.…Gen. Smith is in every way calculated to preside over a great and mighty people."99 Smith promised, "If ever I get into the presidential chair, I will protect the people in their rights and liberties."100 He wanted a refuge for his people, but he also wanted vengeance against his enemies. He said that he would give the president power to send an army to suppress mobs, independent of a governor's request.101 He said there were wicked men in the church and elsewhere that the president should deal with: "We should lift up our voice against wickedness of all kinds. But will the rulers of our land do it? No, they will not; they will be cowards until [p.138] there is no man left to fight, and then they will be brave. When government will not do it, some man should take the helm of government who will do it."102 Orson Hyde would say in June that Smith was "God's messenger to execute justice and judgment in the earth."103 Smith himself would promise at the funeral of King Follett in April that if dissenters felt justified in taking his life because he was a fallen prophet, "upon the same principle am I authorized to take away the life of every false teacher."104 Smith sought the presidency also as a means of eliminating divisive pluralism. As early as 1842 an editorial in the Times and Seasons had argued that the absence of priesthood authority in America had led to
If Smith reached the presidency he would have the power to achieve these ends. His brother Hyrum told the Saints in April 1844: "We want a President of the U.S., not a party president, but a President of the whole people; for a party President disfranchises the opposite party. Have a President who will maintain every man in his rights.…We will try and convert the nations into one solid union. I despise the principle that divides the nation into party and faction."106 Putting the prophet in the White House was calculated to dissolve all distinctions between sacred and secular and make them one. Brigham Young said in April: "The government belongs to God. No man can draw the dividing line between the government of God and the government of the children of men. You can't touch the gospel without infringing upon the common avocations of men."107 A "friend to the Mormons" wrote in even stronger terms to the Times and Seasons that "the church must not triumph over the state, but actually swallow it up like Moses' rod swallowed up the rods of the Egyptians."108 [p.139] Despite the tremendous odds against them,109 Smith and his people evidently hoped that by gaining a balance of power nationally (as they assumed they had in Illinois) they could actually win the election of 1844. The Council of Fifty, which would be the executive, legislative, and judicial arm of the Kingdom of God, was first outlined by Smith in 1842 but fully organized in March 1844.110 The council's first major task was to plan Smith's presidential campaign.111 Elders were sent to several cities and states, and rallies and conventions were planned.112 Apostle Willard Richards wrote to James Arlington Bennett in New York that "General Smith is the greatest statesman of the 19th century" and urged Bennett to run with him as the vice-presidential candidate. He told Bennett to "get up an electoral ticket" in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and any other state within your reach." He informed Bennett they expected to win since "we will go it with the rush of a whirlwind, so peaceful, so gentle, that it will not be felt by the nation till the battle is won."113 Apostle John Taylor exhorted the Saints at Nauvoo in March that "we must do what we can to elect Joseph President and not be cowards."114 Elder Richards wrote to Elder Orson Hyde in Washington in May that "our faith must be manifest by our works, and every honorable exertion made to elect Gen Smith."115 Writing to Hugh Clark, an alderman in Philadelphia, in behalf of the "Central Committee of Correspondence for the election of Gen. Joseph Smith," Richards said that Mormons and Roman Catholics were "most obnoxious to the Sectarian world" yet had not persecuted each other. He urged the alderman to join them in establishing "Jeffersonian Democracy, Free trade and Sailors rights and protection of persons and property." Help us to elect Joseph Smith, he pleaded, "and we shall help you to secure those privileges which belong to you and to break every yoke."116 At a party convention in Jackson, Michigan, on 6 July, before news of Smith's death had reached them, the Saints voted not to "cease until a full & entire revolution should be effected in the administration of the government."117 Two days later Brigham Young wrote to Richards from Salem, Massachusetts, to say, "We shall do all we can and leave the event with God."118 As early as mid-April, James Arlington Bennett had written from New York to say that he thought the prophet had no chance to win, that the best that could be hoped for was the gaining of some political influence.119 Richards's reply, "we mean to elect him,"120 revealed [p.140] the serious intentions of the Council of Fifty. But Mormonsdespite a few hastily organized rallieshad no party organization, no patronage jobs to reward non-Mormons who would support the campaign, and a candidate who was not popular in the national press.121 Thus D. S. Hollister wrote from Wilmington, Delaware, on 26 June that he was greatly disappointed that he could rally little support in Baltimore, and on the 28th he said no delegates had been selected for the party convention from Philadelphia. He intended to attend the convention on 13 July but was doubtful that much had been done to prepare for it in other states.122 James Arlington Bennett believed that the Saints would have better success at finding peace if they pursued another course. He had for some time urged them to establish a government of their own in the west. In April 1844 he urged Willard Richards: "The Mormons should settle out of the States and have an empire of their own. Not only thousands but millions would flock to an independent people. In this case a Patriarchal government with Joseph at the head would be just the thing. In unity there is power. Nothing could resist such a people."123 In establishing the Council of Fifty, Smith set up a political agency for just such a "patriarchal" government. Whether it would be established in the United States, with Nauvoo as the capitol, or in the far west, the Saints would still rule. Plans were made in early 1844 to establish a settlement in Oregon or California.124 As relations with Illinoisans grew worse in 1844, Smith authorized Lyman Wight to seek an alliance with Texans, to settle the "table lands" of Texas, and to establish a theocracy there. He told the Council of Fifty in March to "Send 25 men…and if [Houston] will embrace the gospel […] [We] can amend the constitution and make it the voice of Jehovah and shame the U[nited] S[tates]."125 Thus Smith would either gain the White House or establish an independent government. George Miller, a bishop, described the two alternatives as they appeared at the time. He said they must "do everything in our power to have Joseph Smith elected President, and if we succeeded in making a majority of the voters converts to our faith and elected Joseph Smith President, in such an event the dominion of the kingdom would be forever established in the United States. And if not successful, we could still fall back on Texas and be a kingdom notwithstanding."126 Smith did not relish force as a means to power and told the Saints in May: "it will not be by the Sword or Gun that this kingdom [p.141] will roll onthe power of truth is such thatall nations will be under the necessity of obeying the gospel." Yet he added, "The prediction is that army will be against armyit may be that the Saints will have to beat their ploughes into Swords. It will not do for men to set down and see their women & children destroyed patiently."127 If possible, Smith preferred to gain power through the electoral process. The editor of the Times and Seasons said that Smith's election would curb the increasing secularism in the nation:
The editor said that he feared the nation would soon become "directed by human wisdom alone."128 In case he did not win the election and the Saints had to seek their refuge in the west, Smith memorialized Congress in March to allow Mormons to raise an army of 100,000 volunteers to protect American emigrants going to the far west.129 The prophet's ambition for the White House, according to Thomas Ford, brought him into "conflict with the zealots and bigots of all parties."130 Ford's contention seems plausible given the aspirations of the down-state Whigs, who entertained the idea of a reconciliation with the Saints. A. G. Henry said "the Mormons are worth coaxing a little. They are violent against Van & intend to go for Clay."131 But later a Whig booster said "our Mormon neighbors cannot be relied on. Joe is a candidate for President he will not vote for Mr. Clay."132 Mormon political isolation was now complete, as neither party could hope for their support. In 1844 the Mormon prophet placed himself at the head of his own political party, dedicated to carrying out his will in national politics. Meanwhile, the conviction hardened in Hancock County that the Mormon question had drifted long enough. The determined attitude was evidenced in the return of Thomas Sharp as editor of the Warsaw newspaper in January and the marked increase in its circulation the next month.133 Many were now ready to listen when Sharp insisted that non-Mormons must unite to curb the "encroachments [p.142] of the fanatical band located in our midst."134 Although some were primed to expel the Saints immediately by force, others were hesitant and awaited the next move of the Mormons.135 Sharp was in the vanguard of those dubious of delay. He lashed out at Mormon marriage practices136 and depicted as futile any tendency to temporize.137 He was unmoved when, in a belated attempt at conciliation, Smith repealed the law against "foreign" legal processes.138 If the Mormons want peace, he said,
For an agitator like Sharp the emerging schism at Nauvoo over plural marriage was made to order. As soon as Mormon dissenters began to differ openly with Smith, Sharp was ready to champion their cause. Noting at the end of April that two had been charged with conspiracy by the Nauvoo Neighbor, Sharp warned, "Let Jo dare to harm one of them and he will awaken a spirit to which resistance will be useless."140 The leader of the Mormon rebels was William Law, a former member of the First Presidency141 who had first quarreled with Smith during the August election. Law publicly opposed Hyrum Smith's political revelation, contending that Hyrum was angling for a seat in Congress if he could deliver the Mormon vote for Hoge.142 Also prominent in the opposition to Smith were Wilson Law, William's brother, formerly a commander of the Nauvoo Legion143; Robert D. Foster, a physician, land owner, and brigadier general in the legion144; and Francis and Chauncey Higbee, two sons of former high councilor Elias Higbee, recently deceased.145 Nearly all had quarreled with Smith over polygamy, some claiming that he had "tried to get their wives away from them and had many times committed adultery."146 Foster expressed the disillusionment with Smith that the dissenters felt, writing to him in June: "You have trampled upon [p.143] everything we hold dear and sacred. You have set all law at defiance, and profaned the name of the Most High to carry out your damnable purposes."147 On 6 and 7 April at General Conference, doctrines were publicly advocated which the Laws believed were blasphemousthat there exists a plurality of gods, that God was once a man, that Joseph Smith was a god to this generation, and that the kingdom of God on earth required a human king.148 Wilford Woodruff recorded in his diary as early as 24 March that church leaders had been told that the Laws, the Higbees, and Foster were part of a conspiracy to kill the entire Smith family. Hyrum said at conference that he did not believe this, that "they would not do any thing to injure me or any man's life."149 Despite Hyrum's dissent, charges were leveled against the Laws and Foster, and they were excommunicated on 18 April.150 The cryptic minutes of the Council of the Twelve Apostles indicate that Foster called Joseph Smith a "murderer, Bogus maker counterfiter, [and] adulterer." John Scott testified that William Law had "spoke[n] against Joseph," claiming that Joseph had gone to his wife "to attempt to seduce herJoseph wanted her to come into the order." Scott also said that Law was angry that Joseph would not seal Law to his wife, Jane, which confirmed to him that Smith wanted her for himself.151 Law believed that the hearing was unlawful, since he was not informed of the identity of his accusers and since Sidney Rigdon, one of Smith's councilors in the First Presidency, was not present.152 The dissenters responded to their excommunication by organizing their own church in May, with William Law as prophet.153 They began holding weekly meetings on Sunday,154 attracting approximately three hundred people.155 The discontented group made plans to publish a newspaper at Nauvoo to defend their stand against Smith, and Francis Higbee described to Thomas Gregg the purpose of the forthcoming publication:
According to William Law, Smith sent Rigdon to him on 13 May "to negotiate terms of peace." Rigdon informed him that if they would "let all difficulties drop," church officials would restore William, his wife, and Foster to their "standing in the church and to all [their] offices." Rigdon acknowledged that the excommunication proceedings had been improper and said this would be published in the newspaper. Law demanded that Smith admit publicly that he had taught and practiced polygamy. He warned that otherwise he would "publish all to the world." Rigdon replied that he was not authorized to yield this much.157 At the end of May several of the dissenters moved to bring Smith to trial at Carthage, leveling charges that included adultery and falsely accusing a visitor to Nauvoo of murder. These allegations led to two indictments against Smith.158 Smith tried to avoid falling into the hands of his enemies at Carthage by making a secret trip to the town and demanding an immediate trial. His case was held over until the following month. The atmosphere in Carthage was extremely hostile. Sharp warned in his newspaper:
Thus it was that the Mormon prophet was backed into an inevitable corner. To journey to Carthage for trial would give his bitterest enemies an opportunity to take his life. But not to submit to the jurisdiction of those in authority in Carthage could bring retaliation against Nauvoo. When Smith sought to resolve this dilemma by once again utilizing his writ issuing powers at Nauvoo, the nonMormon community was outraged. As far away as Rock Island the editor of the Upper Mississippian warned ominously, "If the laws and authority of the state can thus be set at defiance by a single individual, it is high time that the people should know it."160 Once more Smith tried to reconcile his differences with church dissenters as a way out of his menacing situation. On the day the Nauvoo Expositor was due for publication Smith sent Dimick Huntington to Robert Foster to propose a conference. He coldly [p.145] rejected the offer. Foster replied: "I have consulted my friends in relation to your proposal of settlement, and as they as well as myself are of the opinion that your conduct and that of your unworthy unprincipled clan are so base that it would be morally wrong & detract the dignity of gentlemen to hold any conference with you.161 When the Expositor appeared on the streets of the city the prophet was alarmed. The newspaper denounced the attempt to "Christianize a world by political schemes and intrigue" and urged church members to repudiate recent innovations in doctrine.162 Smith saw the publication as a threat to church unity and Mormon security. In a meeting of the city council he declared, "The conduct of such men and such papers are calculated to destroy the peace of the city, and it is not safe that such things exist, on account of the mob spirit which they tend to produce."163 Smith moved that the newspaper and printing press be destroyed. The councilmen generally agreed, but a non-Mormon named Warren suggested that it might be better to impose a fine on the publishers rather than destroy their property. Smith disagreed, saying that no Mormon could otherwise safely journey to Carthage. He said he was "sorry to have one dissenting voice in declaring the newspaper a nuisance."164 The council voted to destroy the paper and the press at once.165 A large group of legionnaires and citizens promptly marched to the Expositor office, smashed the press, and scattered its type in the street.166 Smith had made the mistake his enemies were waiting for. The public reaction was immediate and overwhelming. The editor of the Quincy Whig denounced the action as "HIGH HANDED OUTRAGE" and declared that it "really seems to us that their intention is to put the law at defiance." The editor exclaimed, "These people are unworthy to be trusted with power."167 The Alton Telegraph decried the blatant act as "Mormon violence,"168 while the editor of the Lee County Democrat in Iowa said that the destruction of the opposition press "has aroused the people of Illinois and…hundreds of them properly armed and equiped, hold themselves in readyness at a moment's notice to go to Nauvoo to aid…the authorities."169 The editor of the Quincy Herald, a Democratic newspaper, published excerpts from the Warsaw Signal, which declared war and remarked that "the evidence speaks for itself."170 H. H. Bliss of LaHarpe reflected the prevailing public disposition when he said that the issue is "whether the Law should have its corse on Smith or not."171 At Warsaw Tom [p.146] Sharp frenetically declared that "War and Extermination is inevitable. Citizens ARISE ONE AND ALL!"172 William Law now headed to Carthage to charge Smith with instigating a riot. He insisted in his diary that he told the people of Carthage that legal process would be sufficient to correct Mormon wrongdoing.173 Sheriff David Bettisworth of Carthage acted on Law's charges and went to Nauvoo to apprehend Smith. Bettisworth arrived in Nauvoo on 12 June, only to find that Smith refused to be taken to Carthage. He offered to stand trial before any judge, but the proceeding would have to be held in Nauvoo.174 When Bettisworth insisted that Smith return with him, the prophet secured a writ of custody from a Nauvoo court. He was tried on 17 June in Nauvoo and was acquitted.175 In assuming that by taking this step he had met the law's requirements, Smith misjudged the temper of the citizens of Illinois. One older citizen said that they would "not be caught with this trap. Joe had tried the game too often."176 When Bettisworth returned without his prisoner, emotions reached a peak.177 Samuel O. Williams, who was among the throng who received the sheriff, said, "Such an excitement I have never witnessed in my life."178 Messages were sent to all the older citizens for three hundred miles around to gather to Carthage with arms for a march on Nauvoo.179 Two emissaries were sent to Governor Ford to ask for support from the state militia.180 If Ford did not respond favorably, the citizens were determined to form a "posse comitatus" and head for Nauvoo. Mormons were given the choice of surrendering their prophet or going to war.181 Within a week citizens began to collect from many directions. The Warsaw Signal reported how at "Carthage and Green Plains, the citizens are all in arms…throughout the county every man is ready for conflict. In Clark Co., Mo. many hold themselves in readyness.…From Rushville…3,000 men have enlisted for the struggle, McDonough County is alive and ready.…From Keokuk and the river towns…all are coming."182 Meanwhile, Smith wrote to Ford to justify the action he had taken against the Expositor and offered to submit to an investigation before "any legal tribunal at the capitol."183 On 17 June Smith placed Nauvoo under martial law and addressed the legion in a manner reminiscent of Missouri. He said, "I call God and angels to witness that I have unsheathed my sword with a firm and unalterable determination that this people shall have their rights." He added militantly, "I call upon all friends of truth and liberty to come to our [p.147] assistance and may the thunders of the Almighty and the forked lightnings of heaven and pestilence, and war and bloodshed come down on those ungodly men who seek to destroy my life and the lives of innocent people."184 To further implement this call to arms, Willard Richards wrote to James Arlington Bennett to come "with as many volunteers as you can bring." He said, "If the mob cannot be dispersed, and the Government will not espouse our righteous cause, you may soon, very soon, behold the second birth of our nation's freedom."185 In accord with this revolutionary thinking, Smith ordered on 22 June that a "standard be prepared for the nations."186 Hoping to learn the facts and avert civil war, Governor Ford came to Carthage on 21 June. After a brief investigation of the charges and the Mormon defense,187 Ford made the only choice open to him if he wished to avoid civil war. He decided that the Mormons had broken the law on several counts and violated the American constitution. He wrote to Smith on 22 June to argue these points, saying that the cause of the "existing disturbance" in Hancock County was the destruction of the Nauvoo Expositor and the "subsequent refusal of the individuals accused to be accountable therefore…only before your own municipal courts." Ford said, "You have violated the Constitution in at least four particulars. You have violated that part of it which declares that the printing press shall be free…It may have been libelous, but this did not authorize you to destroy it," a point on which scholars would later agree.188 The dissenters should have been brought to trial for libel and given an opportunity to present evidence in support of the truth of their allegations, according to Ford. The second violation of the Constitution, in Ford's mind, was that the city council had not recognized the right of people to be protected "against unreasonable searches and seizures of their property except by judgment of [their] peers." The third point, he said, was that "your Council, which has no judicial powers, and can only pass ordinances of a general nature, have undertaken to pass judgment as a court and convict without a jury…The Constitution," Ford explained, "abhors and will not tolerate the union of legislative and judicial power, in the same body of magistracy, because, as in this case, they will first make a tyrannical law, and then execute it in a tyrannical manner." Ford next took up the matter of Nauvoo's chartered rights and insisted that Smith had exceeded its privileges by initiating writs to free from legal process himself and others accused of crimes. Ford admitted that certain lawyers in the state had encouraged Smith in [p.148] his interpretation, in hopes of political favor. But, he insisted, "You have... assumed to yourselves more power than you are entitled to." He maintained that it was "never supposed by the legislature, nor can the language of your charter be tortured to mean that a jurisdiction was intended to be conferred which would apply to all cases of imprisonment under the general laws of the state or of the United States."189 The Illinois governor thus struck at some of the anti-pluralistic aspects of the kingdom at Nauvoo: the concentration of the power of mayor and judge in the hands of one man who seemed to claim accountability only to himself; the intolerance to criticism; and the apparent indifference to rights of property. In demanding that Smith come to Carthage, Ford seemed indifferent to threats made against his life. Ford may have later regretted this decision, but at the moment he wanted to avert civil war and establish the sovereignty of state law. In siding with anti-Mormons on this issue, he left himself open to charges made by the Mormons that he had been part of the conspiracy to take Smith's life. Ford was most anxious that Mormons do nothing to further antagonize the old citizens and advised Smith: "All of you who are or shall be accused or sued [are] to submit in all cases implicitly to the process of the court, and to interpose no obstacles to an arrest, either by writ of habeas corpus, or otherwise." He said that Smith and others were required to submit to the authorities at Carthage: "I tell you plainly that if no such submission is made as I have indicated, I will be obliged to call out the militia; and if a few thousand will not be sufficient, many thousands will be."190 Isolated, with no friends other than his own people, who were divided, Smith had either to submit to authorities at Carthage, where those who had proclaimed their intention to kill him waited menacingly,191 or flee to a refuge in the east or west,192 with the risk that the city would be attacked in retaliation.193 Fearing for his life, Smith initially crossed the Mississippi River to go into hiding.194 But pleadings from his wife and close friends, and a charge of cowardice, persuaded him to return and submit to trial.195 His attorney, James Woods, arranged for Smith's surrender to state authorities, and he and fifteen others started toward Carthage on the 24th, only to find that Captain Dunn, acting on the governor's orders, wanted him to return to Nauvoo to encourage the Saints to surrender the arms given them by the state.196 [p.149] In Nauvoo, Smith said that he was going to Carthage "like a lamb to the slaughter."197 He was aware of great risks, but his actions and statements afterward made it clear that he expected to remain among the living. His brother, who had argued that they should surrender to authorities, said, "Let us go back and put our trust in God, and we shall not be harmed," a belief Joseph shared.198 Stopping at a plural wife's house en route out of Nauvoo, Smith spoke with some uncertainty but not despair. He said, "If I never see you again, or if I never come back remember I love you."199 He saw his death as a possibility, not an inevitability. The party reached Carthage at midnight, and Smith was placed under guard at the Hamilton Hotel. On the following morning Governor Ford marched the Mormon prisoner in front of the Carthage Greys, who showed their mounting hostility by threatening him with their rifles.200 At the preliminary hearing on the perjury charge, Smith met the legal requirements and might have been released, but his enemies acted quickly and charged him with treason, thus requiring that he be held over in Carthage.201 Tensions continued to mount when Smith was placed in the jail at Carthage and clusters of armed men whispered their hatred of the Mormon leader.202 Smith sensed his danger and told his lawyer, James Woods, on the 27th that he would "never live to see another sun."203 Yet he still hoped to survive. He wrote to his wife shortly after eight o'clock in the morning:
When he learned two hours later that he would not accompany the governor to Nauvoo to urge the Mormons to keep the peace, as planned,205 he was not dismayed. He wrote to Emma: "I just saw that the governor is about to disband his troops,all but a guard to protect us and the peace.and come himself to Nauvoo and deliver a speech to the people. This is right as I suppose."206 When two more hours had passed he addressed a letter to lawyer Browning: "Myself [p.150] and brother Hyrum are in jail on [a] charge of treason, to come for examination on Saturday morning 29th inst. and we request your professional services at that time."207 Smith had underestimated the intensity of personal hatred toward himself and his people. Thomas Sharp would later write that a "Committee of Safety" in Carthage had already determined upon "summary execution" of Joseph and Hyrum.208 They had to await their opportunity. After Governor Ford dismissed the troops at noon on the 27th, and militiamen from Green Plains and Warsaw, disappointed that they had not been led in an attack on Nauvoo,209 stopped at a crossroads to consider their alternatives, Sharp argued that now was the time to join together and rid themselves of the brothers Smith. At this some turned back, unwilling to kill men who were incarcerated and helpless. Others marched toward the jail, faces blackened, intent on murder. They were assured by a note from the captain of the Carthage Greys on guard that they would not meet serious opposition. Arriving at the jail, they brushed aside the few men stationed there and rushed up the stairs to the room where Joseph and Hyrum Smith with two apostles were held.210 The accused, trapped inside, tried to hold the door shut, but some of their assailants managed to shoot into the room, killing Hyrum with a shot through the head. Joseph ran to the window, hoping for an escape, but armed men below fired at him as others did so from the door. The prophet was struck with four musket balls and fell out of the window to the ground below.211 Then one of the assassins stabbed him with a bayonet, making sure of the work.212 The men who committed the cold-blooded murder of the Smith brothers were militia men who despised Joseph for his military pretense and politicos who feared the continuation of Mormon political power. They justified the killings as self defense, appealing to the American revolutionary tradition, saying that the prophet had placed himself above the law.213 This was the same charge Mormons leveled against their tormentors. The murderers hoped that by killing the Smiths it would cause the Saints to dissolve their gathering and their political maneuvering.214 But they misjudged the resiliency of the Mormon people. Of the dissenters who had stirred the wrath against Smith to a fever pitch, the evidence is contradictory as to whether any were at the jail at five o'clock. The Laws and Foster were in town that morning, but Law said that they left and were in Fort Madison by the afternoon.215 Others claimed to have seen them at the jail.216 There [p.151] or not, William Law approved of the murder. He said that at the end the Smiths "knew no mercy…[and] they found none." He said that the man he had once sustained as a prophet of God had one aim"to demoralize the world, to give it to Satan, his master." Ignoring his own part in swearing the writs which brought Smith to Carthage, he said, "God stopped him in his mad career & gave him to his destroyers." Law concluded, "He claimed to be a god, whereas he was only a servant of the Devil, and as such he met his fate.'"217 Whether or not he came to the jail, Law, by transforming Joseph Smith from a god to a devil, eased his guilt for the part he played in the murderous affair. [p.153] |
|
Notes: 2. Flanders's chapter on the Nauvoo economy (155-92) is well done, and I have relied heavily upon it. 4. Ibid., 228, 482; Flanders, 159-60; Times and Seasons 2 (15 Jan. 1841): 274; and 5 (1 Jan. 1844): 391-92. See also Rita Latimer Halford, "Nauvoothe City Beautiful," M.A. thesis, University of Utah, 1945, 291. 8. Ibid., 157, and compare Joseph Smith's "Nauvoo Account Book" which covers 1839-40 and shows that several commercial transactions by Hyrum Smith and others were handled in kind or by personal notes. See pp. 9, 20-23, 84-87 of this ledger which is in the Rare Book Room, Harper Library, University of Chicago. 9. Ford Family Correspondence, Stanley B. Kimball Collection, Southern Illinois University. 12. Nauvoo Neighbor, 13 Nov. 1844, 2. 13. Some Mormons feared the impending repeal of the charter. Flanders, 161-62, and compare HC 5:436-37. 14. See "Our City and the Present Aspect of Affairs," Times and Seasons 5 (15 March 1844): 471, and compare "The Trades," Nauvoo Neighbor, 16 Oct. 1844, 2, and 18 Dec. 1844, 3, where plans were outlined for bringing carriage and harness, cotton and stove factories to the city. 15. Flanders, 166, and Times and Seasons 5 (1 Jan. 1844): 391-92. Compare Rita Halford, "NauvooThe City Beautiful," M.A. thesis, University of Utah, 1945, 309-26. 16. Flanders writes that "the record does not indicate whether the products of the city were sold in outside markets to any extent" (166). My own research gives little evidence that they did since there are no protests against such in the Gentile literature. There seems to have been some disposition in St. Louis to shun a Mormon steamer carrying passengers to Nauvoo but not much more than this. There is no clue in the report of the Senate judiciary committee or in the account of the House debates by the Alton Telegraph as to why some wanted the Nauvoo Agricultural and Manufacturing Association charter repealed. It may be that there was fear of its potential rather than any concrete competition. See Nauvoo Neighbor, 10 May 1843, for evidence of trouble with St. Louis. Also Reports Made to the Senate and House of Representatives of the State of Illinois…, 127-30, for the views of the Senate judiciary committee. For the details of the House debate see Alton Telegraph and Democratic Review, 17 Dec. 1849, 3. 17. Letter from David Jenkins to Leonard Pickel, Nauvoo, 28 Sept. 1842, Pickel papers, Yale University. 18. See the complaint of "a Mechanic" and the admissions of John Taylor in The Wasp, 29 March 1843, 2. Taylor said there was a marked difference between goods that sold for cash and those traded by barter. 19. Hyrum Smith told those at April 1843 conference that a former Saint informed him of a secret band making bogus money in Nauvoo. See HC 5:333-34, and compare Orson Hyde's warning to Brigham Young in 1844 that "if there are not sufficient measures taken to break up a company of bogus makers and route them from this place.…I am apprehensive of very serious consequences" (JH, 29 Dec. 1844). 20. In the Warsaw Signal, 25 April 1844, Sharp noted the circulation of "Nauvoo Bogus" half-dollars dated 1828, said to be made in Nauvoo. Compare also the issue of 22 Jan. 1845. 21. Missouri Republican, 4 July 1844, 2. 22. The Messenger and Advocate of the Church of Christ 1 (1 Feb. 1845): 101. 23. Ibid. Rigdon said that many of the builders had to go as far as St. Louis to find work. Compare the predictions of a non-Mormon that the Saints would emigrate in 1845 due to the lack of work in the city in Quincy Whig, 25 Dec. 1844. Some friends of George Whitaker in St. Louis told him in 1845 not to go to Nauvoo for it was a poor place to make a living. See "Life of George Whitaker, a Utah Pioneer, as Written by Himself," 7, in Kimball Collection. 24. Brigham Young and Wilford Woodruff wrote to Reuben Hedlock in England that "all things are going gloriously at Nauvoo." The whole tone of the letter is optimistic, while nothing is said of the sagging Nauvoo economy. It is significant, however, that the apostles also told Hedlock that all of the United States is Zion and the English Saints might begin to settle elsewhere than Nauvoo. See HC 6:351-54. 25. Orson Spencer, Letters Exhibiting the Most Prominent Doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Co., 1889), 36, maintained that the Saints had every opportunity to become rich, despite some "deep penuary," but instead "long to behold the beauty of the Lord." 26. The Messenger and Advocate of the Church of Christ 1 (1 Feb. 1845): 101. 27. B. H. Roberts, A Comprehensive History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 6 vols. (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1930), 2:166-71 details the developments. 28. Ibid., 166, and Thomas Ford, A History of Illinois (Chicago: S.C. Greggs & Co., 1854), 315, who says that Bennett was involved in the indictment. 31. That Walker understood this to mean the Mormon vote as well is indicated by his comment to Stephen Markham, "I am now sure of my election, as Joseph Smith has promised me his vote, and I am going to defend him." See B. H. Roberts, Comprehensive History, 2:194. 33. The best detail of Mormon preparations to liberate the prophet by military means is found in the papers of William Pattersen Mcintyre, in a report written in 1854, LDSCA. 35. Thomas Ford, in his letter to Governor Thomas Reynolds, 17 Aug. 1843, declining to order out the state militia to arrest Smith, relates the charges of Reynolds that he was taken to Nauvoo "under constraint" and "against his will." Ford's letter appears in Times and Seasons 4 (15 Aug. 1843): 293-95. 37. Quincy Herald, 30 June 1843, 2. 38. Times and Seasons 4 (15 Aug. 1843): 294. Ford wrote to Governor Reynolds that Sheriff Reynolds was taken to Nauvoo "by lawful process; by an authorized officer who acted, so far as I have any evidence, freely and voluntarily in so doing." 39. Roberts, Comprehensive History, 2:172-73. 40. Quincy Herald, 30 June 1843, 2. 41. Roberts, Comprehensive History, 2:170-71. 42. Smith's address of June 30, 1843, is recorded most fully by Wilford Woodruff in his journal. See Kenney, 2:248-252. Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook, The Words of Joseph Smith (Provo, UT: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1980), 222-25, reproduce accounts of the same speech by Willard Richards and William Clayton. 43. Hall's letter appears in the Nauvoo Neighbor, 23 Aug. 1843. 45. Letter of George Rockwell to Thomas H. Rockwell, 3 Aug. 1843, in Kimball Collection. 46. Warsaw Message, 12 July 1843, 2. 47. HC 5:591 and compare Charlotte Haven's affirmation that "all summer politicians, able men of both parties, have been making speeches caressing and flattering the Saints." Overland Monthly 16 (Dec. 1890): 636. 48. T. Ford, 317-18. Ford held that this mission "produced a total change in the minds of the Mormon leaders." 49. Brayman's letter to the prophet is in RLDSCA. 50. Oliver Olney papers, #17, Yale University. Olney said this occurred on Saturday, 30 July, but he was wrong on his date. His general accuracy is supported by an editorial in the Nauvoo Neighbor which urged "the necessity of unanimity [in voting]…it can answer no good purpose that half the citizens should disfranchise the other half, thus rendering Nauvoo powerless as far as politics are concerned." See the issue of 2 Aug. 1843. 51. Willard Richards to Brigham Young, 5 Aug. 1843, Richards papers, LDSCA. 52. Faulring, 401-402. Compare HC 5:526. 54. Nauvoo Neighbor, 30 Aug. 1843, 2. 56. Davenport Gazette, 10, 17 Aug. 1843. 58. Warsaw Message, 6 Sept. 1843. 60. Lee County Democrat, 2 Sept. 1843, 2. 61. Warsaw Message, 13 Sept. 1843. 62. HC 5:537-38; Thomas Gregg, History of Hancock County; Illinois (Chicago: Charles C. Chapman & Co., 1880), 299. 63. See the charges of John Harper, a political opportunist, who out of "curiosity" attended the meeting. Harper insisted that it "was a Whig meeting" and that the "president, Secretary and leading members were all Whigs." Thomas Gregg admitted that the president and secretary were Whigs but said that the committee which brought forward the resolutions was composed of three Whigs and three Democrats and that "several other Democrats took part." See Warsaw Message, 27 Sept. 1843, 2. Compare also the protest of A. Rasp who took issue with Harper but could only name three Democrats who did not fit Harper's generalization. Ibid., 4 Oct. 1843, 2. 64. Thus of twenty-two members of the committees of correspondence organized in the local precincts, Gregg's work shows that at least nine were among the earliest settlers in the county. In addition, he recounts that George Rockwell, Edward Bedell, William Grover, Jacob C. Davis, and Robert F. Smith, all of whom became leaders in the anti-Mormon campaign, were early residents. See a list of the members of the committees of correspondence in HC 6:8; compare Gregg's History of Hancock County, 510, 511, 578, 608, 637-38, 653, 790, 816, 819, 837, 895, and 900, for details of the lives of some of the anti-Mormons. 65. Of the ten identifiable townships represented at the meeting in September, six were located in the eastern half of the countyLaHarpe, Fountain Green, St. Mary's, Augusta, Chili, and Carthage. Appanoose, Montebello, and Warsaw were river towns, economic rivals of Nauvoo but too close to the Mormons for comfort. See a map of the townships in Gregg, at the front. 66. See also Warsaw Message, 6 Sept. 1843, 2, and 27 Sept. 1843, 2. 67. The resolutions are reproduced in HC 6:4-8. According to the Davenport Gazette, the delegates pledged that they would not obey the mandates of the newly elected officials of the county, but there is no specific clause in the resolutions to this effect. See 14 Sept. 1843, 2. 68. HC 6:31, 35. Ford promised he would protect them from invasion. 69. See "Carthage vs. Nauvoo," Nauvoo Neighbor, 13 Sept. 1843, 2. John Taylor and Wilford Woodruff were the editors of the Mormon paper. 72. Andrew Moore to Levi Moore, Carthage, Illinois, 15 Oct. 1843, Mormon Collection, Beinecke Library, Yale University. 75. Ibid., 117-18. This is Sisson Chase's testimony. 77. Ibid., 124; "Nauvoo City Council Minutes," 197, LDSCA. 78. Warsaw Message Extra, 26 Dec. 1843, Mormon Collection, Chicago Historical Society. 79. Two different accounts of the degree of resistance to the arresting officer may be seen in HC 6:171-73 and Quincy Whig, 24 Jan. 1844, 2. 80. Warsaw Message, 27 Sept. 1843, 2. 81. Warsaw Signal, 17 Jan. 1844, 2. Compare "Hannibal's" remarks, p. 1. 82. Smith was told on 14 December not to muster any part of the legion. HC 6:113. 83. Ibid., 119-21. After receiving Ford's "milk and water letter" of 14 December, Smith sent part of the legion to assist a justice of the peace in capturing one of the Avery kidnappers and also to guard against mobbers collecting near Warsaw. Smith's history indicates that on 19 December Hosea Stout, a colonel in the legion, returned to Nauvoo with his troops after coming within two miles of the mob. In a letter to Governor Ford on 30 December Smith said that although the legion had been put on alert no troops had been ordered to march. See HC 5:443 and 6:153, 362. 84. Missouri Republican, 6 Jan. 1844, 2 86. Times and Seasons 4 (15 Sept. 1843): 330; compare HC 6:48-49, which has been altered form the original to cast suspicion on Rigdon again. 88. Times and Seasons 4 (15 May 1843): 204. 90. Ibid., 15-16. Pratt added that the Mormons had political and temporal ambitions like those of Joseph who was sold into Egypt. See the uncensored version, LDSMS 22 (3 March 1860): 134. 91. The plea to Pennsylvania was made by Sidney Rigdon. See HC 6:191-92. 93. Such would not have been possible without the consent of the state of Illinois. 94. HC 6:131. The legion was to be incorporated into the United States army with Joseph Smith in command. 95. LDSMS 22 (21 July 1860): 455. 96. Correspondence of Joseph Smith and John C. Calhoun, 4 Nov. 1843, in Voice of Truth (Nauvoo, 1844), 24. 98. "Diary of George Laub," 1:30, Special Collections, Harold B. Lee Library, Brigham Young University. Compare Kenney, 2:425, for Orson Hyde's lament that had the Gentiles received Smith as their leader he "would have saved the nation from ruin and destruction." 99. Times and Seasons 5 (1 June 1844): 556. 101. General Smith's Views of the Powers and Policy of the Government of the United States, 86. 104. In Times and Seasons 5 (15 Aug. 1844): 613. 105. Ibid., 4 (1 Dec. 1842): 24. 108. Times and Seasons 5 (15 March 1844): 477. 110. Mormon leaders took seriously The New York Herald's assertion that the Saints controlled the vote in Illinois, and hence in the entire west. It warned that they might dictate the destiny of all presidential candidates. See Nauvoo Neighbor, 21 Feb. 1844. Klaus Hansen, Quest for Empire: The Political Kingdom of God and The Council of Fifty in Mormon History (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1974), 60-61. William Clayton details the full organization between 3 and 14 March, but sources conflict as to the exact date. 111. Ibid., 78. D. Michael Quinn argues that the council was not as important as Hansen believed, especially after Smith's death. Quinn is correct that the council did not challenge the system of government in Nauvoo. Nonetheless, Hansen's generalizations stand. The council certainly was prepared to take over real governing responsibilities. See Quinn's "Council of Fifty and Its Members, 1844-1845," Brigham Young University Studies 20 (Winter 1980): 164. 112. Klaus Hansen, 77-79, and Flanders, 302. 113. HC 6:231-32. The letter is dated 4 March 1844. 115. Willard Richards to Orson Hyde, 25 May 1844, Richards papers. 116. Willard Richards to Hugh Clark, 24 May 1844, Richards papers. 117. Charles C. Rich papers, LDSCA. 118. Young to Willard Richards, 8 July 1844, Young papers, LDSCA. 119. Bennett to Willard Richards, 14 April 1844, Bennett papers, LDSCA. 121. Paul D. Ellsworth, "Mobocracy and the Rule of Law: American Press Reaction to the Murder of Joseph Smith," Brigham Young University Studies 20 (Fall 1979): 71-82, notes that although Americans did not like Smith, they did not like his murder either, seeing it as mob violence. James Gordon Bennett, the editor of the New York Herald whom Joseph Smith considered an ally, wrote on 13 August 1842 that he had been given the freedom of the city in Nauvoo and commented, "We suppose it embraces a vast number of delicious privileges." 122. D. S. Hollister to Joseph Smith, 26, 28 June 1844, in Smith papers, LDSCA. 123. James Arlington Bennett to Willard Richards, 14 April 1844. 124. The "Minutes of the Quorum of the Twelve," 20 Feb. 1844, indicate that a committee was to be formed to appoint a company to explore Oregon and California and to "select a site for a new city for the Saints." Smith's diary kept by Willard Richards has Smith saying, "I instructed the 12 [apostles] to send out a delegation and investigate the locations of California and Oregon and find a good location where we can remove after the Temple is completed and build a city in a day and have a government of our own in a healthy climate" (Faulring, 447). Thus it does not sound as though the prophet was abandoning the idea of a central gathering place, a city, where he would preside. However, for a counter argument, see Flanders, 289-91. 126. Correspondeyre of Bishop George Miller with the Northern Islander From His Acquaintance with Mormonism up to Near the Close of His Life, 1855 (Burlington, WI: W. Watson, 1916), 20. 128. Times and Seasons 5 (15 March 1844): 470 129. Flanders, 87-88; HC 6:274-77. 131. The letter, written from Springfield sometime in January 1844, is in the John J. Hardin Collection, Chicago Historical Society. 132. William D. Abernethy to John J. Hardin, Augusta, Illinois, 19 March 1844, John J. Hardin Collection. 133. Warsaw Signal, 31 Jan. 1844, 3, and 28 Feb. 1844, 2. 135. Ibid., 14 Feb. 1844, 2, and 21 Feb. 1844, 2. 136. See "Buckeye's Lamentation for the Want of More Wives," Warsaw Signal, 7 Feb. 1844, 1. Smith indicated that this piece may have been written by Wilson Law who had recently been at odds with the church leader. See HC 6:210. 137. Warsaw Signal, 21 Feb. 1844, 2. 138. HC 6:212. Smith said afterward that he thought if the Gentiles desired peace this should satisfy them. But the bitterness between the two communities had become too deep for a token compromise to satisfy them. See p. 219. 139. Warsaw Signal, 28 Feb. 1844, 2. 140. Ibid., 25 April 1844, 2. Compare HC 6:978-80. 142. Law recalled this disagreement with Hyrum and Joseph during an interview in the 1880s. See Charles Woodward, "The First Half Century of Mormonism" (1880), 288, New York Public Library. Compare Francis M. Higbee's denunciation of the revelation to Hyrum in the Nauvoo Expositor, 7 June 1844, 3. 143. HC 5:84. Law had replaced John C. Bennett as Major-General. 146. The quotation is from the account by Dennison L. Harris and Robert Scott in The Contributor 5 (April 1884): 254. Francis M. Higbee wrote to Smith on 10 January 1844, saying that "he is still of the same opinion fixed and determined as the pol[ar] star that any revelation commanding in any wise suffering sexual intercourse, under any other form than that prescribed by the laws of our country, which has been ratified by Special revelation through you is of HELL; and I [say] defiance to any or all such." Higbee's letter is in the Joseph Smith Collection, LDSCA. William Law's difficulties with the prophet over plural marriage are detailed in Richard S. Van Wagoner, Mormon Polygamy:A History (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1986), 63-65. 148. Ibid., 287-96, and "William Law Diary," 6. A typed copy of this diary is in my possession. 149. Compare Woodruff's journal with the original manuscript of the HC, E1, p. 1,977, where Hyrum's remarks, deleted in the published work, 6:300, were recorded. 151. Alexander Neibaur in his diary in 1844 said he understood that Jane Law had attempted to be sealed to Smith. 152. See "Minutes of the Council of the Twelve," 18 April 1844, and "William Law Diary," 7. Law dated this 19 April. 153. HC 6:354, and Kenney, 2:393. 155. Warsaw Signal, 15 May 1844, 2. 156. The letter, written in May, is located in the Mormon Manuscript Collection, Chicago Historical Society. 157. "William Law Diary," 8-9. 158. Warsaw Signal, 29 May 1844, 2; compare Nauvoo Neighbor, 7 June 1844, 3, which shows that several charges were brought simultaneously by the dissenters. The charge of perjury was brought by Alex Sympson. See HC 6:464-65; Warsaw Signal, 25 April 1844, 3. 160. Upper Mississippian, 25 May 1844. 161. Robert D. Foster to Joseph Smith, 7 June 1844, Smith papers. In HC 6:437. Smith, or those who compiled his history, argued at length that Foster initiated the attempt at reconciliation and that Smith knew nothing of Dimick Huntington's visit to Foster (pp. 436-40). It seems that when Foster turned down his offer Smith was humiliated and did not wish to acknowledge that he had made the effort. See Law's diary, 13 May and 7 June 1844. 162. Nauvoo Expositor, 7 June 1844. 164. Ibid., 445-46. Dallin H. Oaks has argued that Smith and the city council had legal precedent for declaring the newspaper a nuisance but that this did not justify their destroying the press itself. See Oaks, Utah Law Review, 862-903. 166. Ibid., 432, and Oaks, 876. 167. Quincy Whig, 19 June 1844, 2. 168. Alton Telegraph, 15 June 1844, 2. 169. Lee County Democrat, 22 June 1844, 2. 170. Quincy Herald, 14 June 1844. 171. H. H. Bliss to Franklin Bliss, 8 June 1844, Indiana University Library. The press was destroyed on 10 June, so the letter is misdated. |